One more thing



And one more thing:

Quisquis huc accedes
Quod tibi horrendum videtur
Mihi amoenum est
Si dilectat maneas
Si taedat abeas
Utrumque gratum


You who come here
Whoever you are
What may seem horrible to you
Is fine for me
If you like it stay
If it bores you go
I couldn’t care less.


(From the inscription that appears in Latin on a marble plaque at the entrance to Cardinal Chigi’s 17th century Villa Cetinale, at Sovicelli in Tuscany, discovered and translated by John Julius Norwich in “Still More Christmas Crackers – 1990-1999,” [Viking, Penguin Group UK]).




Monday, January 30, 2017

Important observations on the Trump regime's travel ban


Arnold "Skip" Isaacs, a friend and former colleague at The Baltimore Sun, where his assignments included postings in Latin America and Asia, has shared some wise and important observations concerning the crisis brought about by the Trump regime's acts against Muslims entering the United States.

I am proud to share his message here:

Dear friends --


A three-part message...


(1) I am not very comfortable tooting my own horn, but given current
headlines it seems appropriate to call your attention to a long report I
wrote a couple of years ago that touches on both Muslim American and
refugee issues. From Troubled Lands: Listening to Pakistani Americans
and Afghan Americans in post-9/11 America is available online at
www.fromtroubledlands.net. Two chapters have particular relevance to the
present uproar over President Trump's immigration order: chapter II,
"The 9/11 Aftermath" and chapter V, "A Clash of Civilizations?" Another
looks at aspects of the refugee experience -- chapter IV, "Afghan
Americans: the Heritage of Trauma."


(2) Editorial comment: With this policy Trump has given a huge gift to
the Islamic State and other extremist fanatics. He validates their
message that the United States and its people are at war with the Muslim
world and Muslims need to defend themselves with violence. We will never
be able to quantify exactly how many more fighters they will enlist as a
direct result of Trump's action, but there is no possible doubt that it
will help their recruiting. Nor will we be able to count how many fewer
Muslims will join the anti-extremist side, but the number will certainly
be lower than it would have been without this disaster. The number of
Muslims in America who will trust and cooperate with law enforcement and
other public agencies to help find and head off possible violent
radicals will be lower, too. Trump's order will not make us safer; it
makes us significantly less safe.


I can't prove this either but I would make a substantial bet that the
immense majority of our own counter-terror professionals and those we
work with overseas understand that Trump has just made their job a lot
tougher, completely unnecessarily. Americans need to oppose his order as
strongly and publicly as possible not just for the sake of very
important values but for our safety as well. And the Americans who have
the most responsibility for that are the Republicans who control
Congress, who if they have any moral integrity and any grip on reality
will take immediate, decisive steps to reverse this policy and begin
repairing the damage it has done.


(3) Lastly, a few random facts:


-- The overwhelming number of violent terrorist acts inside the United
States after 9/11 were committed by U.S. citizens or permanent
residents. A disproportionate number of Muslim terrorists have been
native Americans who converted to Islam, not immigrants. The risk from
refugees is practically zero; a dozen or fewer cases involving people
with refugee status, out of more than three-quarters of a million
refugees admitted since 2001. And from everything I know, not all those
cases necessarily represent the scenario that anti-refugee rhetoric
promotes: a violent act committed by someone who slipped through the
refugee screening process. As I understand, they include some who did
not do anything violent but contributed funds to supposed terror
organizations overseas, and some who came as children with refugee
families. The number of cases that actually fit the anti-refugee script
is probably no more than three or four.


-- A look back at the wave of sweeping, repressive counter-terror
programs that were put into practice after 9/11 shows that they were
completely ineffective at finding terrorists. NSEERS, the post-9/11
registration program, did not lead to a single terrorism prosecution.
Neither did the years of extensive surveillance by the New York Police
Department in mosques and Muslim neighborhoods. (More about these in my
Troubled Lands paper.) The approach that Trump and his pal Stephen
Bannon and others around him apparently have in mind -- and have put
into practice with this astonishing order -- isn't just questionable as
a matter of logic. It's been tried and proven ineffective.


-- I won't make the case here but will add that the Islamophobia network
was producing fake news years before that term came into use. Its
"evidence" on things like the Muslim Brotherhood "stealth jihad" plan,
the unindicted co-conspirator story about the Council on
American-Islamic Relations, and the plot to impose sharia law is all
provably false -- not just disputed, but conclusively disproven. Stephen
Bannon, by the way, has been a big cheerleader for that crowd (Frank
Gaffney, Pamela Geller, et al) and I would bet is a channel for their
views to reach the White House -- which is REALLY bad news. No idea if
they had anything to do with this immigration order, but it seems
entirely possible.


OK, I'll stop. But I hope you'll pass this along anywhere it might
contribute to the discussion and that you'll find some way to support
opposition to Trump's disastrous order.


Thanks for your patience and best regards


Skip Isaacs

No comments:

Post a Comment