One more thing



And one more thing:

Quisquis huc accedes
Quod tibi horrendum videtur
Mihi amoenum est
Si dilectat maneas
Si taedat abeas
Utrumque gratum


You who come here
Whoever you are
What may seem horrible to you
Is fine for me
If you like it stay
If it bores you go
I couldn’t care less.


(From the inscription that appears in Latin on a marble plaque at the entrance to Cardinal Chigi’s 17th century Villa Cetinale, at Sovicelli in Tuscany, discovered and translated by John Julius Norwich in “Still More Christmas Crackers – 1990-1999,” [Viking, Penguin Group UK]).




Monday, February 27, 2012

The Sun history by Zellous Boobus exChicagus



     Today, looking over The Baltimore Sun website, I was drawn to a part titled “History of The Baltimore Sun,” www.baltimoresun.com/sunhistory . It is a 350-word exercise in idle irrelevance that must have been put together by some Zellous boobus exChicagus.
     Half of the text catalogs the various real estate movements of The Sun from its opening on Light Street in 1837 up to its present location at 501 North Calvert Street, and the development of Sun Park at Port Covington, as if those were major accomplishments. Later it notes that Tribune Company acquired The Sun when Times-Mirror  “merged” with Tribune, without explaining how on earth Times-Mirror of California ever became the owner of The Sun (as it did in 1986 after paying the biggest price ever paid for a newspaper property). Finally, it notes, “In 2007, real estate entrepreneur Sam Zell acquired Tribune Company.” The peculiar and disastrous consequences of real estate entrepreneur Sam Zell’s arrangements are not mentioned in this “history.”  (Bankruptcy, for example).
     Most appalling, the “history”  (his·to·ry  \ˈhis-t(ə-)rē\ : a chronological record of significant events [as affecting a nation or institution] often including an explanation of their causes – Merriam Webster) makes no mention of The Sun’s remarkable  accomplishments in the field of newsgathering and reporting and technology, over a period of more than 160 years before Tribune took over; nor of its commitment to national reporting with a Washington bureau staffed by a dozen men and women, national correspondents travelling from Washington and stationed in places as far away as Los Angeles, or of the development of a network of more than a half dozen – sometime as many as nine -- foreign correspondents in the far-flung capitals of the world. All of which, Tribune has eliminated.
    This and much more could be recorded in the official history of what was once one of America’s greatest newspapers. But what appears on the newspaper’s website is not a history. It is bunk.














    





No comments:

Post a Comment